http://d.puremagic.com/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=3581
--- Comment #6 from Rainer Schuetze <r.sagita...@gmx.de> 2011-03-01 12:49:09 PST --- Thinking about it again, I might have missed the point completely. I don't have TDPL handy right now, but IIRC it allowed overriding the private functions in another mode, doesn't it? That would make the inlining of private members impossible unless final is specified. I still think the two concepts protection/virtuality should be kept apart. -- Configure issuemail: http://d.puremagic.com/issues/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: -------
