http://d.puremagic.com/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=3581
--- Comment #10 from Vladimir <[email protected]> 2011-03-01 16:25:18 PST --- Can "protected" replace "private" in all intended usage of virtual private functions? If so, has it been considered to simply forbid virtual private functions (with a warning or error)? Then programmers should clarify whether they need NVI, or a non-virtual, inlinable private function (by adding "final"). -- Configure issuemail: http://d.puremagic.com/issues/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: -------
