http://d.puremagic.com/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=5691



--- Comment #13 from Andrei Alexandrescu <and...@metalanguage.com> 2011-03-04 
08:35:41 PST ---
walkLength would need forking for opApply, so already for this first example
we're looking at an increase in complexity. This is because walkLength against
a range doesn't need to invoke front, so it uses a straight for loop.

The difference between walkLength and count is that walkLength accepts a limit.

-- 
Configure issuemail: http://d.puremagic.com/issues/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
------- You are receiving this mail because: -------

Reply via email to