http://d.puremagic.com/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=5691
--- Comment #13 from Andrei Alexandrescu <[email protected]> 2011-03-04 08:35:41 PST --- walkLength would need forking for opApply, so already for this first example we're looking at an increase in complexity. This is because walkLength against a range doesn't need to invoke front, so it uses a straight for loop. The difference between walkLength and count is that walkLength accepts a limit. -- Configure issuemail: http://d.puremagic.com/issues/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: -------
