http://d.puremagic.com/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=3463
Leandro Lucarella <[email protected]> changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- CC| |[email protected] --- Comment #122 from Leandro Lucarella <[email protected]> 2011-04-14 20:06:11 PDT --- (In reply to comment #121) > (In reply to comment #120) > > I understand the advantages of a moving GC - heap compaction allowing for an > > overall smaller managed heap etc., but I hope you understand that > > sacrificing > > speed for these goals is not an unilateral improvement for everyone. > > Since we don't have any hard benchmarks conveniently available, let's assume > for the sake of argument that a precise/moving/etc. GC would be slower. Your > case is a niche case and calls for a niche garbage collector implementation. > D's GC is designed (IIRC) to allow selecting an implementation at link time. > Eventually, someone could write a decent low-latency GC optimized for small > heaps for game programmers. In the mean time, we could fork the current one. > The stock GC, though, should handle the common cases, not a few game > programmers' corner case. You mean like this one (except it's not optimized for small heaps, just for small pauses and works)? http://llucax.com.ar/blog/blog/post/-1a4bdfba PS: Yeah, for some reason I still get the e-mails even when I removed myself from te Cc =/ -- Configure issuemail: http://d.puremagic.com/issues/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: -------
