http://d.puremagic.com/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=3746
Don <[email protected]> changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- CC| |[email protected] --- Comment #12 from Don <[email protected]> 2011-06-14 05:19:10 PDT --- (In reply to comment #10) > (In reply to comment #9) > > > > I don't understand. Elsewhere I have a bug report that asks for a new error > > message if you don't use the result of a pure function. > > But this bug report just asks for a better error message in the situation of > > using "return x;" in a void function. So I expected an error message like: > > > > foo.d(20): Error: a void function can't return 'int'. > > Returning an int expression from a void function is perfectly legal, so long > as > the expression has side effects. This is explicitly allowed by the spec. > http://www.digitalmars.com/d/2.0/statement.html#ReturnStatement Yes, but it was agreed on the newsgroup that this is a misfeature. (Andrei was horrified about it). It should be disallowed. -- Configure issuemail: http://d.puremagic.com/issues/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: -------
