--- Comment #10 from Iain Buclaw <> 2012-01-30 03:55:12 PST 
(In reply to comment #9)
> >This I think is different from how DMC++ treats the align attribute, which is
> where the conflict of interest arises. 
> Which means that dmd should change to match gcc for gcc platforms. The 
> addition
> of an align(0) is not the right solution.

It's not an addition of align(0) - although currently I think the parser will
accept any non-negative integer, which needs to be addressed.   The point
Daniel raised in question is that it would be helpful if there was information
available so we could tell the difference between whether the user specified
align: or align(n), so we can do the right thing accordingly.

Configure issuemail:
------- You are receiving this mail because: -------

Reply via email to