--- Comment #23 from Stewart Gordon <> 2012-02-01 04:21:17 PST ---
(In reply to comment #20)
> 2. This "let's add a filler doing nothing, discuss it ad nauseam, and consider
> implement later" is an utter waste of time. If someone really wants they can
> implement it, don't add this useless filler for hypothetical future-proof
> libraries that don't exist.

So you're waiting for somebody to write a library, built on my first point in
comment 9, that doesn't compile because current DMD flags a syntax error?

Configure issuemail:
------- You are receiving this mail because: -------

Reply via email to