http://d.puremagic.com/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=9272
--- Comment #4 from Nicolas Sicard <[email protected]> 2013-01-05 09:17:39 PST --- (In reply to comment #3) > (In reply to comment #2) > > (In reply to comment #1) > > > opDispatch takes precedence and just fails to compile. > > > > Obviously. But is it really by design? > > > > This works, where opDispatch does not take precedence: > > --- > > struct Foo { > > void opDispatch(string s)() {} > > } > > > > void baz(Foo f) {} > > > > unittest { > > Foo foo; > > foo.baz(); // OK > > } > > --- > > Just *template* opDispach is required for operator overloading. Therefore > non-template function is simply ignored. Yes. I understand why it doen't work at the moment. I just found it inconsistent. Maybe this should be an enhancement request then... -- Configure issuemail: http://d.puremagic.com/issues/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: -------
