http://d.puremagic.com/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=2946
Andrej Mitrovic <[email protected]> changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|NEW |RESOLVED CC| |[email protected] Platform|x86 |All Resolution| |WONTFIX --- Comment #8 from Andrej Mitrovic <[email protected]> 2013-01-20 12:26:13 PST --- I don't think this will fly. Abstract on the class name itself makes it non-instantiable, however subclasses are not abstract and can be instantiated: // can't be instantiated abstract class Foo { void foo() { } } // is not abstract and can be instantiated class Bar : Foo { } Whether or not there's an abstract keyword next to the class name doesn't tell you whether the class actually has abstract methods, so there's no benefit forcing you to add 'abstract' to the name. -- Configure issuemail: http://d.puremagic.com/issues/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: -------
