http://d.puremagic.com/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=2946
--- Comment #11 from Stewart Gordon <[email protected]> 2013-01-21 12:40:39 PST --- (In reply to comment #10) > There might be a problem with this since D supports separate > compilation. There can be another object file that contains the > implementation of Bar.someAbstract. I'm not sure if this applies > here. No, for this to apply, Bar would need to contain its own declaration of someAbstract. -- Configure issuemail: http://d.puremagic.com/issues/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: -------
