http://d.puremagic.com/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=2573
--- Comment #5 from Don <[email protected]> 2013-03-05 02:12:54 PST --- (In reply to comment #4) > (In reply to comment #3) > > Keywords are fully maintained (beyond the point of creation) on the > > bugs that utilize that keyword. > > Where is the keyword for data integrity issues? There isn't, it covers too many disparate things to be a helpful category. It has a very large overlap with wrong-code. > Still, it's only the opinion of a few people. OK, so there are probably more > whom we don't know about. But clearly many people find them useful for > various > reasons. The commonness of them on b.m.o is evidence of this. Nobody fixing D bugs has found them useful AFAIK. BTW this is the almost the only remaining umbrella bug in the D bugzilla. > > And this one isn't even an umbrella bug, it's a personal gripe list. > > How does a collection of data integrity bugs constitute a "personal gripe > list"??? To quote the bug description: "the point is to show how we have a D that isn't as robust against data corruption as it's cracked up to be." Very similar to your old "pending peeves" list. That's fine for a wiki, but doesn't belong in Bugzilla. It doesn't contribute to getting anything fixed. -- Configure issuemail: http://d.puremagic.com/issues/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: -------
