http://d.puremagic.com/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=2573
Stewart Gordon <[email protected]> changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|RESOLVED |REOPENED Resolution|FIXED | --- Comment #6 from Stewart Gordon <[email protected]> 2013-03-06 05:20:21 PST --- (In reply to comment #5) > (In reply to comment #4) >> Where is the keyword for data integrity issues? > > There isn't, it covers too many disparate things to be a > helpful category. In your opinion. > It has a very large overlap with wrong-code. How do you work that out? >> Still, it's only the opinion of a few people. OK, so >> there are probably more whom we don't know about. But >> clearly many people find them useful for various reasons. >> The commonness of them on b.m.o is evidence of this. > > Nobody fixing D bugs has found them useful AFAIK. BTW this > is the almost the only remaining umbrella bug in the D > bugzilla. What has usefulness to a specific minority of users to do with anything? The fact remains that some people find trackers useful. >> How does a collection of data integrity bugs constitute a >> "personal gripe list"??? > > To quote the bug description: > "the point is to show how we have a D that isn't as robust > against data corruption as it's cracked up to be." > > Very similar to your old "pending peeves" list. That's > fine for a wiki, but doesn't belong in Bugzilla. It > doesn't contribute to getting anything fixed. You haven't answered the question at all. How does "a D that isn't as robust against data corruption as it's cracked up to be" equate to "a D that isn't to some random individual's liking"? In any case, the fact remains that we need more people's opinions before deciding what to do with this issue. I'll start a discussion on the newsgroup about it when I've a bit more time (hopefully this evening). -- Configure issuemail: http://d.puremagic.com/issues/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: -------
