http://d.puremagic.com/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=10009
--- Comment #4 from Andrej Mitrovic <[email protected]> 2013-04-29 16:06:07 PDT --- (In reply to comment #2) > (In reply to comment #1) > > I think foreach_reverse was only ever meant to be used with arrays (and is > > scheduled for deprecations), for ranges you can use retro() from > > std.algorithm. > > I have hundreds of usages of foreach_reverse in my D2 codebase. You aren't > going to deprecate it. retro() is not nearly as efficient for arrays. Why is retro less efficient though? -- Configure issuemail: http://d.puremagic.com/issues/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: -------
