http://d.puremagic.com/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=10009
--- Comment #11 from Steven Schveighoffer <[email protected]> 2013-05-06 11:25:25 PDT --- (In reply to comment #10) > Which is essentially the same problem as bug# 6251. Not exactly. AA is a type, not a delegate. It is allowed to define opApplyReverse. A delegate cannot possibly be valid with foreach_reverse (and that bug should be killed with prejudice). Even if opApplyReverse is defined for AAs, the implementation will be wrong (as bearophile described) because it's built from singly linked lists. -- Configure issuemail: http://d.puremagic.com/issues/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: -------
