http://d.puremagic.com/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=10550
--- Comment #10 from Masahiro Nakagawa <[email protected]> 2013-07-08 09:26:03 PDT --- (In reply to comment #9) > ... > In summary, I think we can proceed as follows: > > * confirm with experts in the field the typos in the paper > > * generate new checking sequences with corrected versions of the C code > > * correct the D code and unittests accordingly > > I am actually inclined to jump ahead with getting the patches to Phobos done, > because I'm pretty confident my analysis here is correct :-) I rechecked the paper and I agree with you (y^=, a < c and 160's >>) So I think we can fix this paper derived bugs. Could you send the pull request? After passed auto tester, I will merge it. On the other hand, confirm the typos is good for future generations. -- Configure issuemail: http://d.puremagic.com/issues/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: -------
