http://d.puremagic.com/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=10550
--- Comment #12 from Joseph Rushton Wakeling <[email protected]> 2013-07-08 12:49:09 PDT --- (In reply to comment #11) > (In reply to comment #10) > > I rechecked the paper and I agree with you (y^=, a < c and 160's >>) > > So I think we can fix this paper derived bugs. > > Could you send the pull request? > > After passed auto tester, I will merge it. > > Yes, I'll get that submitted either later this evening or tomorrow. :-) First step -- corrected reference code: https://github.com/WebDrake/xorshift I first implemented versions that match _exactly_ Marsaglia's sample code, and that reproduce the checking values from std.random: https://github.com/WebDrake/xorshift/blob/4305bd5a0ac4d94f59505713a085b34d2e4d482e/xorshift.c Subsequent commits correct the typos we've observed, and so the current version can be used to generate updated checking values. -- Configure issuemail: http://d.puremagic.com/issues/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: -------
