https://d.puremagic.com/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=12510
Kenji Hara <[email protected]> changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|NEW |RESOLVED Resolution| |INVALID --- Comment #2 from Kenji Hara <[email protected]> 2014-04-03 01:36:24 PDT --- (In reply to comment #1) > I think this might be the result of bug 1528. Not sure, but I think the empty > template arguments are matched with MATCHexact, just like a plain function > declaration. And subsequently converting both function arguments to const is > deemed a better match than the template. > > You can use this instead. > > bool foo (const C lhs, const C rhs) > { > foo!(C, C)(cast()lhs, cast()rhs); > } Yes, this is correct result caused by fixing issue 1528. Another way is to supply "specialized foo" for const C parameters, like as: bool foo(T:Object, U:Object)(const T lhs, const U rhs) { return foo(cast()lhs, cast()rhs); } -- Configure issuemail: https://d.puremagic.com/issues/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: -------
