https://issues.dlang.org/show_bug.cgi?id=13125
Walter Bright <[email protected]> changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|NEW |RESOLVED Resolution|--- |INVALID --- Comment #6 from Walter Bright <[email protected]> --- I'm going to resolve this as invalid because: 1. I'm pretty sure it never did work, even if it compiled. va_list doesn't work that way. At least now the compiler flags that this construct won't work. 2. va_list is magic on Posix 64, and this is allowed by the C Standard. We can't make the compiler make this work and be compliant with C varargs. 3. What DWT is doing is not the right way to do things with va_list. 4. DWT will need work to port it to 64 bits, as it never has yet run on 64. --
