https://issues.dlang.org/show_bug.cgi?id=13125
--- Comment #8 from Jacob Carlborg <[email protected]> --- (In reply to Walter Bright from comment #6) > I'm going to resolve this as invalid because: > > 1. I'm pretty sure it never did work, even if it compiled. va_list doesn't > work that way. At least now the compiler flags that this construct won't > work. I'm pretty sure it does work. I think it's an misunderstanding due to the error message I reported. I found this issue first on Linux 32bit and the reproduced it on OS X 64bit where the error message is from. > 2. va_list is magic on Posix 64, and this is allowed by the C Standard. We > can't make the compiler make this work and be compliant with C varargs. > > 3. What DWT is doing is not the right way to do things with va_list. > > 4. DWT will need work to port it to 64 bits, as it never has yet run on 64. It's my fault for creating the report this way, I thought the platform didn't matter. This is on Linux 32bit. Any way. Do you have a suggestion for a workaround? What is the appropriate way to forward varargs? --
