https://issues.dlang.org/show_bug.cgi?id=16283
Henry Block <[email protected]> changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|NEW |RESOLVED Resolution|--- |INVALID --- Comment #7 from Henry Block <[email protected]> --- (In reply to Sobirari Muhomori from comment #6) > Imagine a grammar that expresses this rule: "can't refer to `super` in a > struct method that is not nested in a class method". Haha, yes I see. Sorry, I see now that I'm misunderstanding the grammar's purpose. --
