https://issues.dlang.org/show_bug.cgi?id=16283
Steven Schveighoffer <schvei...@yahoo.com> changed:
What |Removed |Added
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
Status|RESOLVED |REOPENED
CC| |briancsch...@gmail.com
Resolution|INVALID |---
--- Comment #8 from Steven Schveighoffer <schvei...@yahoo.com> ---
Sorry, but that's lazy. We can easily express the grammar that a module cannot
have a constructor (in contrast to your analogy, there is a separate module
grammar from classes, so we have a perfect spot to outlaw it).
We put up with a lot of grammar inaccuracies that result in simply ignored
attributes. We can do better.
Even if the actual code treats the grammar for modules and classes the same,
the documentation can reflect the actual result. Right now, it looks like
constructors are allowed.
CC grammar guru Brian
--
