Sam Hu: > Doesn't D already has the built-in types cfloat, cdouble, creal, ifloat, > idouble, and ireal?What's the advantage having complex class instead?
Some people have discussed/complained that complex types aren't worth being built-ins, so the *struct* Complex of std.complex of D2 will replace them. (I am not sure such complex struct is as good as the current built-ins, but it seems most D1 users don't use complex numbers much, so they don't care). Bye, bearophile
