On Thu, Jun 11, 2009 at 11:02 PM, Saaa<em...@needmail.com> wrote: > Any advantage to using two?
I just tend to prefer template specialization when doing type pattern matching. It works out better than is() in some cases. > He also does : is( T B ==B[]) iso is( T B:B[] ) > Any significant difference there? I'm.. not sure, in this case anyway. Normally == does strict type comparison while : does implicit type conversion, but in this case, is() is being (ab)used to pick apart a type rather than test one. I think it'll always return 'true' in either case if T is an array, so I don't think there's a functional difference. > Also, what's the advantage of explicitly defining it as a template? As opposed to what, implicitly defining it as a template? This question doesn't really make sense.
