>Um, there's no "one's better than the other." Don't overgeneralize on things you don't understand. Implicit conversion is necessary in some cases, and in others, exact comparison is needed.
I didn't mean it like that, don't worry :) I mean, I apparently used implicit when I actually wanted explicit. >A function template is just a function in a template. Templates can work just fine on their own. If you're manipulating types, there's really no need to get functions involved. Check >See "Implicit Template Properties" here: http://www.digitalmars.com/d/1.0/template.html Reading . . >When you create a member in a template with the same name as the template, you can access it from the template without explicitly writing ArrayDepth!(int[]).ArrayDepth.
