Hello again, I started to be found of defining types which basically are arrays with free functions, instead of creating a struct or class with methods. Not only we still have pseudo-method syntax (for arrays only), but this allows customizing the type when needed. But: is there a way to define functions corresponding to language operations (opEquals, opIndex, toString...) without creating a true type?
Thank you, Denis -- -- -- -- -- -- -- vit esse estrany ☣ spir.wikidot.com
