On Tuesday, December 07, 2010 10:10:31 spir wrote: > Hello again, > > I started to be found of defining types which basically are arrays with > free functions, instead of creating a struct or class with methods. Not > only we still have pseudo-method syntax (for arrays only), but this allows > customizing the type when needed. But: is there a way to define functions > corresponding to language operations (opEquals, opIndex, toString...) > without creating a true type?
No. You need to create an actual type for that sort of thing. Arrays aren't intended to be used for creating types. strings are kind of a special case in that regard, and they're not exactly their own type anyway. - Jonathan M Davis
