On Monday, 29 June 2020 at 22:47:16 UTC, Steven Schveighoffer
wrote:
Yes. The return statement is inside the scope of the function,
so it runs before the scope is exited. Are you saying the spec
doesn't say that?
Thanks for the assurance. The spec does state it like this:
```
The ScopeGuardStatement executes NonEmptyOrScopeBlockStatement at
the close of the current scope, rather than at the point where
the ScopeGuardStatement appears.
```
Which is correct, but there is no single example with a return
where the ScopeBlockStatement interferes with the return.
I started wondering about this since I hit a bug in a piece of
code.
