On Tuesday, 30 June 2020 at 12:18:14 UTC, Steven Schveighoffer
wrote:
On 6/30/20 2:56 AM, Arjan wrote:
On Monday, 29 June 2020 at 22:47:16 UTC, Steven Schveighoffer
wrote:
[...]
Thanks for the assurance. The spec does state it like this:
```
The ScopeGuardStatement executes NonEmptyOrScopeBlockStatement
at the close of the current scope, rather than at the point
where the ScopeGuardStatement appears.
```
Which is correct, but there is no single example with a return
where the ScopeBlockStatement interferes with the return.
I started wondering about this since I hit a bug in a piece of
code.
I can see where it would be confusing, and it could probably
contain an example and clarification.
-steve
That would certainly be helpfull.
