On Thursday, 13 August 2020 at 21:10:57 UTC, Steven Schveighoffer
wrote:
On 8/13/20 4:51 PM, Andre Pany wrote:
[...]
So in your real world scenario, a non-D thread/program is
calling sample, and it controls the location of *i? If so, then
no, you can't depend on D not collecting that data, because D
might not scan that location.
[...]
As long as you aren't allocating again later, yes. You can also
disable collections and only run them when you know it's safe
to do so.
-steve
Thanks for the answers. This clarifies all my questions.
Kind regards
Andre
