On 10/16/20 9:05 AM, Steven Schveighoffer wrote: > The destruction of members is outside the destructor's purview. It can't > turn the destruction off, so it should logically be considered part of > an enclosing function.
Thank you. Makes sense. Ali
Ali Çehreli via Digitalmars-d-learn Fri, 16 Oct 2020 09:46:20 -0700
On 10/16/20 9:05 AM, Steven Schveighoffer wrote: > The destruction of members is outside the destructor's purview. It can't > turn the destruction off, so it should logically be considered part of > an enclosing function.
Thank you. Makes sense. Ali