Re: low-latency GC

[Ola Fosheim Grostad via Digitalmars-d-learn]

On Sunday, 6 December 2020 at 05:41:05 UTC, Bruce Carneal wrote:
OK.  Some rationale?  Do you, for example, believe that 
no-probable-dlanger could benefit from a low-latency GC?  That 
it is too hard to implement?  That the language is somehow 
incompatible? That ...

The GC needs to scan all the affected call stacks before it can 
do incremental collection. Multi threaded GC is generally not 
compatible with low level programming.