On Sunday, 6 December 2020 at 08:59:49 UTC, Ola Fosheim Grostad
wrote:
Well, you could in theory avoid putting owning pointers on the
stack/globals or require that they are registered as gc roots.
Then you don't have to scan the stack. All you need then is
write barriers. IIRC
Abd read barriers... I assume. However with single threaded
incremental, write barriers should be enough.
- low-latency GC Bruce Carneal via Digitalmars-d-learn
- Re: low-latency GC Ola Fosheim Grostad via Digitalmars-d-learn
- Re: low-latency GC Bruce Carneal via Digitalmars-d-learn
- Re: low-latency ... Ola Fosheim Grostad via Digitalmars-d-learn
- Re: low-late... Bruce Carneal via Digitalmars-d-learn
- Re: low... Ola Fosheim Grostad via Digitalmars-d-learn
- Re:... Bruce Carneal via Digitalmars-d-learn
- ... Ola Fosheim Grostad via Digitalmars-d-learn
- ... Ola Fosheim Grostad via Digitalmars-d-learn
- ... Bruce Carneal via Digitalmars-d-learn
- ... Ola Fosheim Grøstad via Digitalmars-d-learn
- ... IGotD- via Digitalmars-d-learn
- ... Ola Fosheim Grostad via Digitalmars-d-learn
- Re:... Paulo Pinto via Digitalmars-d-learn
- ... Ola Fosheim Grostad via Digitalmars-d-learn
- ... Bruce Carneal via Digitalmars-d-learn
- ... Ola Fosheim Grostad via Digitalmars-d-learn
- Re: low-latency GC Max Haughton via Digitalmars-d-learn
-