On Tue, Jul 20, 2021 at 01:07:22AM +0000, seany via Digitalmars-d-learn wrote: > On Tuesday, 20 July 2021 at 00:37:56 UTC, H. S. Teoh wrote: > > On Tue, Jul 20, 2021 at 12:07:10AM +0000, seany via Digitalmars-d-learn > > wrote: > > > [...] > > [...] > > > > I didn't test this, but I'm pretty sure `continue` inside a parallel > > foreach loop simply terminates that iteration early; I don't think > > it will skip to the next iteration. > > > > [...] > > Ok, therefore it means that, if at `j = 13 `i use a continue, then the > thread where I had `10`... `20` as values of `j`, will only execute > for `j = 10, 11, 12 ` and will not reach `14`or later ?
No, it will. Since each iteration is running in parallel, the fact that one of them terminated early should not affect the others. T -- Skill without imagination is craftsmanship and gives us many useful objects such as wickerwork picnic baskets. Imagination without skill gives us modern art. -- Tom Stoppard
