Simen kjaeraas Wrote: > > Hopefully I'm not wrong on this, but you should even be able to change > > the type as long as the size is the same. So instead of int you could > > use uint or byte[8]... granted the library will still interpret it as > > int. And of course that is assuming you are on a machine with a 32 bit > > int. > > And 4-bit bytes? :p
Right, leave me alone I keep switching which number goes here. :)
