> On Friday, 21 January 2022 at 17:25:20 UTC, Ali Çehreli wrote: [...] > > Additionally, just because we *provide* a step, now we *require* > > division from all types (making it very cumbersome for user-defined > > types). [...]
It doesn't have to be this way. We could just use DbI to inspect whether the incoming type supports division; if it does, we provide stepping, otherwise, just plain ole iteration. DbI rocks. T -- Doubt is a self-fulfilling prophecy.
