On 5/9/22 20:52, Ben Jones wrote: > Using is(T) instead of isType!T also appears to be true for the > un-instantiate-able enum. Was your point just that I could replace > isType!T with is(T)?
I just found something that looked like a workaround. I don't know whether it is by design or by accident or whether this exercise exposes a compiler or language bug. Sorry... :)
Ali
