Re: Non-ugly ways to implement a 'static' class or namespace?

[thebluepandabear via Digitalmars-d-learn]

I do not agree, that a compiler that allows a programmer to 
misuse a type, should be seen as 'a feature'.

If that's the kind of 'power' D programmers want, then D is not 
for me.

Eh, I don't think I would _quit_ D because of this issue, but 
it's definitely something that bothers me (more so the lack of an 
ecosystem) especially since I come from a .NET/JVM background. 
I'm pretty shocked this isn't a feature tbh.