Re: Non-ugly ways to implement a 'static' class or namespace?

[Ali Çehreli via Digitalmars-d-learn]

On 2/5/23 17:50, thebluepandabear wrote:

> I don't see why you'd want
I am not saying it would be wanted or needed.

> to expose a static class/namespace as a
> variable, or any of such similar things. That would give no benefits to
> the programmer?

Perhaps. As I responded to ProtectAndHide, if there is a benefit then it 
is useful by definition; if there is no benefit then it wouldn't be used 
anyway.

Ali