On Wednesday, 15 February 2023 at 20:10:31 UTC, ProtectAndHide
wrote:
What Mike is arguing, is that I don't need a 'data hiding'
mechanism for a user-defined type, because that is already
provided to me by the 'data hiding' mechanism of the module.
That is his argument.
My argument is that I want 'data hiding' mechanism at the
user-defined type level as well.
Again, his argument is that i don't need it.. because...
Wrong. I'm arguing things:
1. D has encapsulation (you say it doesn't).
2. We don't need a new protection attribute or a redefinition of
private because D already provides the mechanism to give you what
you want.
