On Thursday, 16 February 2023 at 21:23:53 UTC, ProtectAndHide
wrote:
Forcing programmers to use a design mechanism rather than a
language mechanism to achieve the above abstraction is wrong.
This seems to be the source of the disagreement, correct?
There's no disagreement. It's you posting the same false claim
again and again (presumably because you're hoping it will come up
when someone does a search for it, or some similar reason) and
others explaining why you're wrong.
If you don't want to use the language, don't use it. You have
your subjective preferences. You are unable to muster a good
argument in favor of it. There's no reason to (yet again) post
the same thing over and over.
