On Saturday, 1 April 2023 at 22:48:46 UTC, Ali Çehreli wrote:
On 4/1/23 15:30, Paul wrote:

> Is there a way to verify that it split up the work in to
tasks/threads
> ...?

It is hard to see the difference unless there is actual work in the loop that takes time.

I always use the Rowland Sequence for such experiments. At least it's better than the Fibonacci Range:

```d
struct RowlandSequence {
  import std.numeric : gcd;
  import std.format : format;
  import std.conv : text;

  long b, r, a = 3;
  enum empty = false;

  string[] front() {
    string result = format("%s, %s", b, r);
    return [text(a), result];
  }

  void popFront() {
    long result = 1;
    while(result == 1) {
      result = gcd(r++, b);
      b += result;
    }
    a = result;
  }
}

enum BP {
  f = 1, b = 7, r = 2, a = 1, /*
  f = 109, b = 186837516, r = 62279173, //*/
  s = 5
}

void main()
{
  RowlandSequence rs;
  long start, skip;

  with(BP) {
    rs = RowlandSequence(b, r);
    start = f;
    skip = s;
  }
  rs.popFront();

  import std.stdio, std.parallelism;
  import std.range : take;

  auto rsFirst128 = rs.take(128);
  foreach(r; rsFirst128.parallel)
  {
    if(r[0].length > skip)
    {
      start.writeln(": ", r);
    }
    start++;
  }
} /* PRINTS:

46: ["121403", "364209, 121404"]
48: ["242807", "728421, 242808"]
68: ["486041", "1458123, 486042"]
74: ["972533", "2917599, 972534"]
78: ["1945649", "5836947, 1945650"]
82: ["3891467", "11674401, 3891468"]
90: ["7783541", "23350623, 7783542"]
93: ["15567089", "46701267, 15567090"]
102: ["31139561", "93418683, 31139562"]
108: ["62279171", "186837513, 62279172"]

*/
```

The operation is simple, again multiplication, addition, subtraction and module, i.e. So four operations but enough to overrun the CPU! I haven't seen rsFirst256 until now because I don't have a fast enough processor. Maybe you'll see it, but the first 108 is fast anyway.

**PS:** Decrease value of the `skip` to see the entire sequence. In cases where your processor power is not enough, you can create skip points. Check out BP...

SDB@79

Reply via email to