On Sunday, 13 August 2023 at 16:10:32 UTC, ryuukk_ wrote:

Core API should subscribe to the premise: give memory allocation control (and therefore dealocation) back to the user


I'm not sure about why RAII is an issue, but I fully agree with your stance about a simpler allocator, and one we can actually build upon.

Great many C libraries work with just 3 preprocessor macros for malloc, free, realloc, something like that. A standard struct with 3 pointers in druntime would be great!

We just can't build upon std.experimental.allocator if it doesn't work in betterC and WebASM.

And it should be clear by now that D programmers want dependencies with fewer files, fewer concepts, fewer new names, (and if I may less templatitis) else they won't build upon it.
  • std.experimental... IchorDev via Digitalmars-d-learn
    • Re: std.exp... ryuukk_ via Digitalmars-d-learn
      • Re: std... Richard (Rikki) Andrew Cattermole via Digitalmars-d-learn
        • Re:... ryuukk_ via Digitalmars-d-learn
          • ... Richard (Rikki) Andrew Cattermole via Digitalmars-d-learn
            • ... ryuukk_ via Digitalmars-d-learn
              • ... Richard (Rikki) Andrew Cattermole via Digitalmars-d-learn
              • ... Guillaume Piolat via Digitalmars-d-learn
            • ... IchorDev via Digitalmars-d-learn
    • Re: std.exp... Paul Backus via Digitalmars-d-learn

Reply via email to