On Sunday, 2 February 2025 at 22:40:41 UTC, Jabari Zakiya wrote:
I am really impressed!
D is phenomenally memory efficient with this code.
I just ran the D code for some really large n values.
On my older Lenovo Legion 5, using Linux (June 2024) w/16GB
I was able to go up to n = 1,000,000,0000 and it took up
~14.4GB max, out of ~14.9GB usable.
I got a new, fast TUXEDO Gen 3, w/64GB (Jan 2025), so I'm going
to how high I can go on it.
Nice. Maybe create a github repo with results from different
languages. It will be interesting to see the comparison.
I haven't checked other parts of the code - maybe it is possible
to improve the performance a bit more (to reduce some
allocations, use `appender` instead of `~=` operator)
But will see what other will produce first :)
