On 9/11/11 11:12 PM, Jonathan M Davis wrote:
The "in" operator normally returns a pointer to the value that you're trying
to find (and returns null if it's not there). Making it return bool may work,
but it's going to be a problem for generic code. That's like making
opBinary!"*" return a type different than the types being multiplied. It's just
not how the operator is supposed to be used and could cause problems.
- Jonathan M Davis
+1, I once ran into a bug because of which I used bool instead, but that
one should be fixed since quite some time now.
David
