On Mon, 12 Sep 2011 00:11:11 +0200, Timon Gehr <timon.g...@gmx.ch> wrote:
I think the fact that "in" for AAs returns a pointer is a mistake and ugly in the first place and any generic code that relies on any container to return a raw internal pointer is flawed by itself imho.
If D had a Nullable struct, that would likely be a much better return type for 'in'. The thing is, we do have a nullable!T type: T*. This is simply a case of having a wrench and needing a hammer. -- Simen
