On 2011-11-07 20:36, Dejan Lekic wrote:
Andrej Mitrovic wrote:class Rectangle : IShape, Drawable {} It's pretty common in other languages, I've seen it used in D as well.I used the same naming convention for interfaces until I saw this presentation: http://www.infoq.com/presentations/It-Is-Possible-to-Do-OOP- in-Java (jump to 0:42 if you do not want to see this brilliant presentation). In short there is an interface RecentlyUsedList, and Kevin recommends that good name for implementation is something like ArrayBasedRecentlyUsedList. And he is also against IRecentlyUsedList names... I actually agree with what he suggests, and stopped using INames for interfaces. :) PS. the presentation is not Java advocacy, it contains lots of Java criticism...
If the interfaces are the primary API, not implementation specific classes, then the interfaces should not be have a ugly ma,e qualify them with "I" or similar. If there is a need to separate the class and interface names then choose the ugly name of the implementation classes.
-- /Jacob Carlborg
