Re: Optional out parameter of function

[Joseph Rushton Wakeling]

On 27/11/13 11:15, Jonathan M Davis wrote:
Personally, I think that it's by far the best approach to just do
      int foo(int i)
      {
          int j;
          return foo(i, j);
      }

It's clean, and I really don't see a big problem with it.

Yea, that's really the conclusion I had already come to.  I emailed the list 
because I wondered if there was a friendly syntax to enable one to quietly drop 
a parameter, as one might do for an in-parameter.