On 12/04/2013 12:49 AM, Max Klyga wrote:
range.map(...).flatten.map(...) might look similar and it could be possible to squeeze monads to work with this api, but the thing is that not every monad could provide a meaningful map function
Yes, every monad provides a meaningful way to map morphisms. In Haskell this is not explicit however: map :: Monad m => (a -> b) -> m a -> m b map f = (return . f =<<)
and as a whole calling flatten after every map is a bit tiresome.
