On Wednesday, 4 December 2013 at 10:03:51 UTC, Timon Gehr wrote:
On 12/04/2013 12:49 AM, Max Klyga wrote:
range.map(...).flatten.map(...) might look similar and it
could be
possible to squeeze monads to work with this api, but the
thing is that
not every monad could provide a meaningful map function
Yes, every monad provides a meaningful way to map morphisms.
In Haskell this is not explicit however:
map :: Monad m => (a -> b) -> m a -> m b
map f = (return . f =<<)
and as a whole
calling flatten after every map is a bit tiresome.
You are right. Now looking at provided implementation this seems
obvoius
