Re: std.range.equal or == in isPalindrome

[Per Nordlöw]

On Tuesday, 18 February 2014 at 10:47:33 UTC, bearophile wrote:

Stanislav Blinov:

Range interface should be minimal.

I agree. But I didn't mean to ask for that operator in the Range protocol. I think some ranges should define a ~ operator. It's easy to write a "chainable" trait. I did that for my nonstandard D1 library.

Bye,
bearophile

Could you post the isChainable trait?

I'm curious :)

/Per